Beautiful. But. Editing There are artifacts around the tower (and along the building's outline), the sky is striped... If the image were smaller, it would be better...
Beautiful. But. The editing. There are artifacts around the tower (and along the building's outline), the sky is striped... If the size were smaller, it would have been better compressed...
Mitrich68, it's not the editing, but the size limitations. Maybe I didn't compress it very well, the original is perfect... Thanks for your opinion
Beautiful. But. Editing. There are artifacts around the tower (and along the building's outline), the sky is striped... If the size were smaller, the image would be better... Mitrich68, it's not the editing, but the size limitations. Maybe I didn't compress it very well, the original is perfect... Thanks for your opinion :)
Sergey Shaposhnikov,
Damn, that's why I'm writing SIZE. The photo needs to be smaller! I can't even scroll through the photo on my 23-inch monitor! What the hell is the size? 300 kilograms is clearly not enough. And the whole impression of an otherwise good photo is ruined...
Damn, I'm writing about the photo size, it needs to be smaller! I can't even view the photo on my 23-inch monitor without scrolling! Why such a big screen? It's clear that 300 kilos isn't enough. And the whole impression of an otherwise good photo is ruined...
Mitrich68, why? Well, there are monitors larger than 23... it looks fine on a 27-inch monitor, for example.
Damn, I'm writing about the SIZE of the photo, it needs to be smaller! I can't even view the photo on a 23-inch monitor without scrolling! Why such a size? It's clear that 300 kilos is too small. And the whole impression of an otherwise good photo is ruined... Mitrich68, why? Well, there are monitors larger than 23... on a 27, for example, it looks fine :)
Sergey Shaposhnikov, And what percentage of the population, if I may ask, has a 27-inch monitor? You should be focusing on the common people... We're all amateurs here. With rare exceptions. And then, I think it looks inferior on a 27-inch monitor too. However, we've strayed from the topic. The photo is good. The processing... Purely personal.
There are artifacts around the tower (and along the building's outline), the sky is striped... If the image were smaller, it would be better...
Thanks for your opinion
Damn, that's why I'm writing SIZE. The photo needs to be smaller! I can't even scroll through the photo on my 23-inch monitor! What the hell is the size? 300 kilograms is clearly not enough. And the whole impression of an otherwise good photo is ruined...
And what percentage of the population, if I may ask, has a 27-inch monitor? You should be focusing on the common people... We're all amateurs here. With rare exceptions.
And then, I think it looks inferior on a 27-inch monitor too.
However, we've strayed from the topic. The photo is good. The processing...
Purely personal.
I agree with your comment