Very well filmed. But... But the peasant is lonely, and not very colorful. Maybe a couple of crows, maybe an old woman with a bucket for pay. Maybe move a little to the side, so as not to get in his face...
Serg Dav., here Marina Glebova wrote to me - look at those triangles! Because I went against the grain of this site. You're responding in exactly the same way You were there, you were there. Of course, you know better what's best. I'm just looking at the result and judging it from my own perspective.
Boris Tashlitsky, I've read it. All that's left for me to do is wish you good luck and more genre photos. As they say, to set a good example. I promise to subscribe to your work then. And the fact that we discuss and argue about it here and there simply brings us closer to the truth.
Serg Dav., show me what you can do? You don't need to be a photographer to appreciate a photo from your own perspective. You need a little life experience. At first, I exhibited genre shots in the "People of Jerusalem" series. But as you once noted, "genre doesn't rule here." Now landscapes are something! Or can we also discuss "pancakes" for days? Subscribe - and then will I be happy?
Serg Dav., thank you. I have a perennial problem with "bad triangles." And the furrow often doesn't go into the corner as it should. Because my genre shots are always spontaneous. There's no time to think, the "plot" will disappear The problem is simply expressing honestly, without regard for the consequences, your "only correct" opinion So if I notice your genre, I'll definitely tell the "truth" Good luck!
My genre shots are always spontaneous. There's no time to think.
Boris Tashlitsky, Photos can be spontaneous, but cropping and retouching are still necessary. Then the composition will be even. I'm also for the truth; there's no point in deceiving yourself.
...the peasant's everyday life is well depicted...I like it..
Lyudmila Khalfina, These are not peasant's everyday life, this is a peasant's ENTRANCE. A peasant never plowed his acres on weekdays; those in power didn't allow it. And this is the reality of our lives.
But the peasant is lonely, and not very colorful. Maybe a couple of crows, maybe an old woman with a bucket for pay.
Maybe move a little to the side, so as not to get in his face...
Look at how the houses on the ZP are arranged, how the furrow runs
Marina Glebova wrote to me - look at those triangles! Because
I went against the grain of this site. You're responding in exactly the same way
You were there, you were there. Of course, you know better what's best. I'm just looking
at the result and judging it from my own perspective.
You don't need to be a photographer to appreciate a photo from your own perspective.
You need a little life experience. At first, I exhibited genre shots
in the "People of Jerusalem" series. But as you once noted, "genre doesn't rule here."
Now landscapes are something! Or can we also discuss "pancakes" for days?
Subscribe - and then will I be happy?
And the furrow often doesn't go into the corner as it should. Because my genre shots
are always spontaneous. There's no time to think, the "plot" will disappear
The problem is simply expressing honestly, without regard for the consequences,
your "only correct" opinion
I'll definitely tell the "truth"
Nekrasov on the hard lot of the peasants...