Are you able to display your photos at a smaller size?
I'll repeat the question: why do this?
When you turn on your TV and look at the screen, do you really see the entire image? A monitor has a screen. And that screen isn't always enormous. For me to see your photo in its entirety, my monitor would have to grow in width and height. However, in my opinion, there's an easier way. REDUCE the size of the photo.
What if it's black and white? It would be interesting here, NMV.
R.Bakson, and my interest here is in the blue sky - and the orangey window light, in the lilac snow on the road - and the yellowish illuminated trees. It's a shame to lose)).
Vlad (ytrewq), The original has all this: a low, overcast sky, the color was visible, though not as clearly as here.
Larisa Kolesnikova, Is this a request or an order? I understood what you meant the second time around, but I have a 20" diagonal screen, it doesn't look like a big picture... And again, will there be any negative comments from those who have an even larger monitor?
It depends not on the diagonal, but on the monitor resolution. On my monitors, the image fits completely on a 1920x1200 (24-inch) monitor, but not on a 1600x900 (laptop) monitor.
Alexander Zelensky conducted an experiment: with standard aspect ratios of uploaded photos: 16:9 and 4:3 fit on any monitor, non-standard ones - there can be anything (some fit, others don't)
Old Diver, I usually worry about the dimensions before preparing for printing, but I've never really paid attention to them (squares are an exception). Reducing the size is always an unnecessary effort for me; I'm always too lazy. But if there are hidden meanings (for example, one was revealed to me), then I won't indulge laziness.
Alexander Zelensky, to be honest, didn't bother with the dimensions either, I always set it to 1200. But it turns out the problem wasn't noticed because of the widescreen 16:10 monitor. But on 16:9 it apparently exists.
My interest here is in the blue sky and the orange window light, in the lilac snow on the road and the yellowish illuminated trees. It's a shame to lose it.
netageorg, Vlad (ytrewq), Are you kidding? This... is... for you? I don't understand anything anymore...
Marina Glebova, I stared at this photo for a long time and, like Vlad (ytrewq), I kept changing it to black and white. And about the website... I think I've already had enough arguments with everyone to shake up this mess... I've run out of strength.
I can't speak for the site; let the Administration decide what's going forward and what's going backward.
Vlad (ytrewq), here's an example photo that tells a similar story. Compare them in all respects. But this one is from five years ago. So where are we heading?
Alexander Zelensky, I'm not against you taking pictures; go ahead and take them. I was upset that people who are seriously interested in photography were okay with this.
Alexander Zelensky, I'm not against you taking pictures; go ahead and take them. I'm upset that people who are seriously interested in photography are okay with this.
Marina Glebova, I noticed your personal disapproval of my photos. I can't say I'm happy about it, but I'm not particularly upset either.
Marina Glebova, I understand everything. Just like you, I understand what I'm talking about. I look at a lot of old photos here on the site. And I can clearly see what's going on. But it doesn't just happen. Everything has its reasons. And you certainly know most of those reasons. I'm tired of suggesting things. Nobody needs it.
Regarding this photo. I see progress in Alexander (progress, in my opinion) and I supported him in this. But I repeat: I only understand black and white.
I'll also speak from my own experience. I was deeply impressed by Alexei Krik's monologues back in the day. He was the one who first got through to me and opened the world of real photography to me. I was lucky to attend those lectures. That's not the case anymore, with rare exceptions. What can people like Alexander learn from? From beautiful photographs, like those from Un Certain Regard? Yes. But they don't understand them. Not because they're flawed or stupid. No. They just haven't gotten it yet. We haven't helped them. Hopefully, not yet.
Vlad (ytrewq), I already wrote about the BBC film "Photography's Gift." Here's a link where you can watch all six episodes. It's been removed or copyrighted on many websites. I highly recommend everyone watch it. It's about the history of photography... There's a bibliography on the website's forum, but few people read it.... http://videosearch.cc/search/Bbc%20%E4%E0%F0%20%F4%EE%F2%EE%E3%F0%E0%F4%E8%E8
If anyone has any other interesting links to films, please post them here.
Vlad (ytrewq), I already wrote about the BBC film "Photography's Gift." Here's a link where you can watch all six episodes. It's been removed or copyrighted on many websites. I highly recommend everyone watch it. It's about the history of photography... There's a bibliography on the website's forum, but few people read it.... http://videosearch.cc/search/Bbc%20%E4%E0%F0%20%F4%EE%F2%EE%E3%F0%E0%F4%E8%E8
If anyone has any other interesting links to films, please post them here.
T4-re, it's not showing anything on my phone. Thanks. I'll watch it on my computer a little later.
Vlad (ytrewq), I already wrote about the BBC film "The Gift of Photography." Here's a link where you can watch all six episodes. It's been removed or copyrighted on many websites. I highly recommend everyone watch it. It's about the history of photography... There's a bibliography on the website's forum, but few people read it... http://videosearch.cc/search/Bbc%20%E4%E0%F0%20%F4%EE%F2%EE%E3%F0%E0%F4%E8%E8
If anyone has any other interesting links to films, please post them here. T4-re, It's not showing anything on my phone. Thanks. I'll watch it on my computer a little later.
Alexander Zelensky, if you're interested in another opinion - I didn't see any processing, specifically "artistic processing." There are traces of editing, but it's mostly noise reduction (it did a good job). But... the following are debatable for me: color correction (maybe in black and white?); grip (why the sharpness accent on the fence? Apparently they wanted to get a circle of light in the branches? They missed the mark).. Maybe there are options with a different emphasis or with more grip?; shooting quality (e.g. overexposure); compositional solution (does the flashlight in the branches really need to be there? Maybe the top should be cropped with it?) .. However, I don't insist on the latter - it's up to the author.) And yet, the author managed to convey the mood, the frame is interesting to look at, there is a certain note of nostalgia in it.. I liked it! Respect!
Kalju4ii, of course, I'm interested in your opinion, very interesting. I see this view every day, maybe that's why I find it so appealing. I think I deleted the originals (I'm not sure), but I'll be able to retake them soon. Winter is just around the corner.
Let me explain.
In any editor, you can reduce your photo to 800 on the larger side.
Open the link.
http://radikal.ru/
Look carefully.
There's a little thing there...
REDUCE TO 800
something like that...
Go ahead.
A monitor has a screen.
And that screen isn't always enormous.
For me to see your photo in its entirety, my monitor would have to grow in width and height.
However, in my opinion, there's an easier way.
REDUCE the size of the photo.
Did I make that clear?
What if it's black and white?
That would be interesting, NMV.
Larisa Kolesnikova, Is this a request or an order? I understood what you meant the second time around, but I have a 20" diagonal screen, it doesn't look like a big picture... And again, will there be any negative comments from those who have an even larger monitor?
I looked at my monitor's resolution, and it says "resolution 1680x1050 (16:10)"
Are you kidding? This... is... for you? I don't understand anything anymore...
But it seemed to me that these were steps the site was taking backwards :-((
I stared at this photo for a long time and, like Vlad (ytrewq), I kept changing it to black and white.
And about the website... I think I've already had enough arguments with everyone to shake up this mess... I've run out of strength.
T4-re, well, keep going in black and white, keep going. If you do it well, you'll soon find something even in...
Compare them in all respects. But this one is from five years ago. So where are we heading?
Marina Glebova, I'm not claiming anything, I'm just showing what I'm filming. I think you feel the same way.
I was upset that people who are seriously interested in photography were okay with this.
I look at a lot of old photos here on the site. And I can clearly see what's going on. But it doesn't just happen. Everything has its reasons. And you certainly know most of those reasons.
I'm tired of suggesting things. Nobody needs it.
Regarding this photo. I see progress in Alexander (progress, in my opinion) and I supported him in this. But I repeat: I only understand black and white.
I'll also speak from my own experience. I was deeply impressed by Alexei Krik's monologues back in the day. He was the one who first got through to me and opened the world of real photography to me. I was lucky to attend those lectures. That's not the case anymore, with rare exceptions. What can people like Alexander learn from? From beautiful photographs, like those from Un Certain Regard? Yes. But they don't understand them. Not because they're flawed or stupid. No. They just haven't gotten it yet. We haven't helped them. Hopefully, not yet.
I already wrote about the BBC film "Photography's Gift."
Here's a link where you can watch all six episodes. It's been removed or copyrighted on many websites. I highly recommend everyone watch it. It's about the history of photography...
There's a bibliography on the website's forum, but few people read it....
http://videosearch.cc/search/Bbc%20%E4%E0%F0%20%F4%EE%F2%EE%E3%F0%E0%F4%E8%E8
If anyone has any other interesting links to films, please post them here.
Here's another 23-episode series
"Control Fingerprints"
http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/470655/
I think I deleted the originals (I'm not sure), but I'll be able to retake them soon. Winter is just around the corner.
- does this story suggest that all reporters are vultures at heart?
(And only landscape photographers are as pure as angels!?)