Ivan Mironov June 6, 2018, 1:11 PM Your criteria for artistic photography are strange. How would you rate Gustave Courbet's "The Origin of the World"? This work has long been recognized as a masterpiece. Art is, after all, a reflection of our lives and a way to understand them, not a kitchen table setting. And if truth is valued in life, not lies, why should we reason any differently in art? (Ivan Mironov, quote from another website, but under the same photograph) Gustave Courbet... Monet, Renoir, Rubens... you can sense the artistic level! I was reminded of a connoisseur and admirer of Klimt who recently appeared here (I can't remember his name) with his "Danae in Lupines." He's a very similar artist, both in his style of depiction and in his manner of discussing high art.
Vixtur, I generally got the impression that photographers these days only know "The Origin of the World" and "Black Square" and, depending on the context, insert these titles into their comments.
Vixtur, I generally get the impression that photographers these days only know "The Origin of the World" and "Black Square" and, depending on the context, insert these titles into their comments.
Inversed Men, They shamelessly "insert" the square, and anything else, anywhere.
Mironov Ivan June 6, '18, 1:11 PM Your criteria for artistic photography are strange. How would you rate Gustave Courbet's "The Origin of the World"? This work has long been recognized as a masterpiece. Art is, after all, a reflection of our lives and a way to understand them, not a kitchen table setting. And if truth is valued in life, not lies, why should we reason any differently in art? (Ivan Mironov, quote from another site, but under the same photograph) Gustave Courbet... Monet, Renoir, Rubens... you can sense the artistic level! I was reminded of a connoisseur and lover of Klimt who recently appeared here (I can't remember his name) with his "Danae in Lupines"; a very similar artist, both in his style of depiction and in his manner of discussing high art.
Vixtur, you're angry because you're dissatisfied. Maybe it's because of your life, maybe because of your photos, maybe because you envy me. I don't care. Keep inflating your gallbladder.
Vixtur, you're mad because you're dissatisfied. Maybe with your life, maybe with your photos, maybe because you're jealous of me. I don't care. Keep inflating your gallbladder.
Ivan Mironov, You're not going to block my commenting ability, are you?
Vixtur, you're mad because you're dissatisfied. Maybe it's because of your life, maybe because of your photos, maybe because you're jealous of me. I don't care. Keep on inflating your gallbladder.
Ivan Mironov, By the way, you still haven't responded to my request to tell me about your ARTISTIC EDUCATION?
Your criteria for artistic photography are strange. How would you rate Gustave Courbet's "The Origin of the World"? This work has long been recognized as a masterpiece. Art is, after all, a reflection of our lives and a way to understand them, not a kitchen table setting. And if truth is valued in life, not lies, why should we reason any differently in art? (Ivan Mironov, quote from another website, but under the same photograph)
Gustave Courbet... Monet, Renoir, Rubens... you can sense the artistic level! I was reminded of a connoisseur and admirer of Klimt who recently appeared here (I can't remember his name) with his "Danae in Lupines." He's a very similar artist, both in his style of depiction and in his manner of discussing high art.
Vixtur, I generally got the impression that photographers these days only know "The Origin of the World" and "Black Square" and, depending on the context, insert these titles into their comments.
http://www.photosight.ru/photos/6652089/?from=users%2F344645%2F%3Fpager%3D2
Courbet and Monet are relaxing, and the turn signals on the motorcycles glow like Christmas stars... oh, I can't stand it.