the place is undoubtedly picturesque

Otsetskiy Evgeny (no_mad), not really. It's just a ski resort. There's nothing to do there in the summer. I personally like the light on the mountain at ZP. The dog just happened to wander in

k.s., the light is not bad, I would of course like a square)

Voir le recadrage Evgeny Otzetsky (no_mad), something like that? Basically, yes, but I don't like cutting up the original either

k.s., you can do it that way, you can even give more sky... well, it's purely personal preference.

Otsetskiy Evgeny (no_mad), the sky back then was uninteresting, especially in the backlight. But thanks for the advice anyway

Why is the photo wrong?

I liked it: photo

the light is beautiful

good!

Thanks to everyone who dropped by! ZhurAVic, she seems unbalanced to me. And the dog doesn't seem to be needed, or maybe it's in a different place... I'm not sure.

Nice photo

Dmitri Romanenko,
I agree!

k.s., that's exactly what's so cool about it; the wrong photos are real, living their own lives, glimpsed but undisturbed by the author; the right photos are dead photos; no, well, yes, even the dead have their charm, like the mummies of pharaohs or the relics of saints, but, as a rule, the living are more interesting
Everything is in place, the shot is pinpoint accurate, a true masterpiece, as they say, nothing to add or take away.

Great photo. Looks like something out of a fairy tale book about a little traveling dog :))

I wonder what the dog is doing here? There's some white grass behind it—it would be nice to have it as a checkpoint. And getting off the road—a landscape with asphalt is rare.

Voir le recadrage something like this

ZhurAVic, thank you. It's nice that someone besides me actually likes it. As for the masterpiece, I disagree; I haven't reached the level of masterpieces yet. Thank you!
Alexey Bragin, by the way, yes, there is something magical about it. Thank you!

Joker, with this cropping Voir le recadrage it's really unnerving. And there's a feeling of compressed space. The photo is wrong, but there's air in it, and it's animated. I'm not sure if this is the right place. I already wrote about it in the comments. But I like it as is. Thanks for the feedback.

Voir le recadrage Or a little more – to shift the focus to the beautiful light on the background. What's the difference between air and excess space, by the way?

How's the new lens, by the way? Was this shot with it?

Joker, no, I shot that with a kit lens. It's still new, so I've only tested it a couple of times. It's not really suitable for landscapes, only if you're stitching panoramas together.

By the way, what's the difference between air and excess space?

I think everyone has to decide for themselves. I'm not the go-to guy for the country to know all the answers.

Maybe, just for fun, I'll try cropping it according to your recipe and take a closer look. For now, it seems to me that in this format, the photo becomes a standard view of sunlit mountains, and I don't see anything special in it anymore.

k.s., I can't help but agree with the lovely lady. It's not a masterpiece, really, it's an immortal masterpiece ;
A truly successful shot is always an accident; a sincere photographer feels a little awkward when it's mentioned in a positive light

ZhurAVic, well, now it’s not just me who’ll blush, but the photo too

I agree with k.s. - the light for the salary is good, but the dog is so-so - it doesn't play a special role ;)